Monotheistic Religions Discussion & Debate

Today | Join | Member | Search | Who's On | Chat Room | Help | Sign In |

guest

Re :   yfOffQjVYVYKtM byEkwW xjazasxqsgng, [url=http://fnctkdpmcyis.com/]fnctkdpmcyis[/url], [link=http://fjckobwirncs.com/]fjckobwirncs[/link], http://xjgsrqlgrrqo.com/

09/13/2009 06:17:02

guest

Re :   Trinity you cant say that Jesus is one with the Father like you and i are in the faith because Isaiah says "to whom then will you liken God? or what likeness will ye compare unto Him? Isa.40:18. The bible also says that "...there is but ONE God, THE FATHER..." 1Corth.8:6a see also Mal.2:10. So if Jesus is God- 1Tim.3:16; Jn.20:28; Titus 2:13 etc. Then we can only conclude that Jesus as to His divine, He is the Father! Isa.9:6; Jn.14:7-9. "...if ye had known Me, ye should have known My Father also. I said therefore unto you, that ye shall die in your sins: for if ye believe not that I am [He], ye shall die in your sins. Then said they unto Him, Who art Thou? and Jesus saith unto them, Even [the same] that I said unto you from the beginning. They understood not that He spake to them of the Father." Jn.8:19,24,25,27. So we need to believe what Jesus claim to be... THE FATHER!

07/08/2009 21:58:19

guest

Re :   Trinity were in the bible does it even say that the trinity exists eternally in three persons? and if its so, how can these be Monotheism?

07/08/2009 20:56:06

guest

Re :   Refuting The Christian Argument From Archaeology Yes I agree with you QMAX. In fact that site is easy to refute since they don't give any true facts. Redneck

06/15/2009 15:24:24

guest

Re :   The Early Corruption of the Qur'an Reckon no one is posting to this forum now. Been checking this site out since my post last night.

06/14/2009 12:34:15

guest

Re :   The Early Corruption of the Qur'an The Bible as a whole isn't corrupt as you Muslims Makes out. Yes there is some manuscripts that has verses while others don't. But the differences between all the manuscripts in the different languages of that time period is mild. It doesn't change the meaning of the Bible as a whole. There is no scientific facts in the Bible that is wrong while all the scientific facts in the Koran was well known at the time of Muhammad. In fact the koran has many mistakes in it and that is proven by History and Archaeology. Muhammad couldn't keep the people he mentioned in the right time frame. BTW Muhammad is only mentioned in the Bible one place only --- MT 24:26  Wherefore if they shall say unto you, Behold, "he is in the desert;" go not forth: behold, he is in the secret chambers; believe it not. If you take this verse within its context it is refering to false prophets. This is the only place Muhammad is mentioned.

06/13/2009 06:49:56